Gravelpit style CP but A OR B to C

[MacNetron]

I've been messing around with the CP style maps. I got a normal linear game working, and a game like Gravelpit with A AND B then C.

But now I like to do something different.
So Red is defending, Blu is attacking. Initial Blu needs to attack A and B. But instead of having A AND B before they can cap C, I want Blu to be able to cap C if A OR B is capped. Note, they still need all caps to win.

Problem is, in the team_control_point for C, I can set "BLUE Previous Required Point 1" and "2" to corresponding A and B but they seems to be ANDed.

Suggestions to OR the required points? (or should I have this added into the Consolidated List? :) )

EDIT: I've been trying to use the Output of for instance A to set the "BLUE Prev....1" to A. Problem, looks like I can't do that :(

[A Boojum Snark]

When A is captured have it send an input to B forcing it's capture, and vise versa. If you don't want that I could find another method.

[dirtyminuth]

Alternatively, have a fourth point, D, removed from the playing area. Have C be dependent on D, and when A or B is captured, force D to be captured as well. This should avoid the visual oddity of, when A is captured, B suddenly becoming captured too.

This is all assuming you can force captures via entity I/O. I haven't touched CP entities.

[DrHaphazard]

That's a clever solution dirtyminuth. I'd love to know if that worked out for ya Mac.

[MacNetron]

damn, the site crash has my previous reply removed.
Alas, here we go again:

dirtyminuth's suggestion works! :thumbup:

Here you see cap A and B on the big hazardstrip. A and B free to cap, C is locked. In the distance is neutral point D.
http://83.81.118.36/gfx/cp_gravel_cappoints_aandb_0.jpg


After capping A (or B) the output of A (and same for B) OnCapTeam2 triggers a SetOwner on D to team Blu. As C has a required point D in its properties, C gets now unlocked.

http://83.81.118.36/gfx/cp_gravel_cappoints_aandb_1.jpg

I'll try to make a tutorial in a couple of days, although this should already be enough for the intermediate mapper.

[Youme]

awesome :D

[ZargonX]

Clever solution!